Official: HSBC drops dozens of London missions

Hmmm... could the September 1 termination of government and corporate immunity from prosecution be involved? Was the Papal Apostolic letter the movitation? Did HSBC grow a conscience?  Was there the "white powder" in some of those diplomatic pouches?  Why so much cash flowing through embassies? Why won't any other banks pick up the business? Very curious indeed!  :) -AK


Official: HSBC drops dozens of London missions
Raphael Satter, Associated Press 2:18 p.m. EDT August 4, 2013
Britain HSBC
(Photo: Lefteris Pitarakis AP)


Official: Diplomats scramble to find a new place to put their money as HSBC closes their accounts. 

More than 40 different embassies, consulates and high commissions affected
The move was part of a wider reassessment started by chief executive Stuart Gulliver in 2011
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/08/04/hsbc-bank-close/2616933/

LONDON (AP) — HSBC bank has told dozens of foreign missions in London that it will close their bank accounts, an official said Sunday, news that has sent diplomats across the capital scrambling to find a new place to put their money.

Bernard Silver, an ex-honorary consul who serves as president of the Consular Corps of London, said he'd been told by British officials that more than 40 different embassies, consulates, and high commissions had been affected.

"The majority of missions are finding it very difficult for other banks to accept them," he said in a telephone interview.

Silver declined to name any specific missions, but the Mail on Sunday newspaper said that the Papal Nunciature — the Vatican's mission to London — was affected, as was the Papua New Guinea High Commission and the honorary consul from Benin.

Attempts to reach the Vatican's mission, Benin's honorary consul, and Papua New Guinea's high commissioner were not immediately successful, but the newspaper cited an official at the latter as expressing shock at the move.

"We've been banking with HSBC for 22 years," John Belavu was quoted as saying. "For them to throw us off in this way was a bombshell."


HSBC spokesman Will McSheehy said Sunday that the move was taking part of a wider reassessment of its business started by chief executive Stuart Gulliver in 2011. As of May, the bank's retrenchment strategy has seen 52 peripheral or underperforming units close and a loss of roughly 40,000 staff.

McSheehy said the changes had translated into a "significantly diminished appetite for the embassy business," although he declined to reveal how many U.K. missions had their accounts pulled.

Foreign missions traditionally deal in large amounts of cash, something which may have raised uncomfortable questions at a bank that has been buffeted by money laundering scandals. In 2012 HSBC was slapped with a record fine after U.S. officials revealed that its bankers had been handling assets belonging to Iran, Libya and Mexico's murderous drug cartels. HSBC is still struggling to clear its name, including in one case revolving around a former employee who claims to have evidence showing "scandalous" levels of tax evasion and money-laundering at the company.

McSheehy said that compliance issues were just one of many factors — such as profitability or efficiency — which the bank had assessed.

"There's no one single reason," he said.

Britain's Foreign Office declined to confirm the number of missions involved, saying only that it had sent an unspecified number of diplomats advice on finding a new U.K. bank. A spokeswoman said there was little more for the British government to do.

"This is a commercial matter," she said, speaking on condition of anonymity in line with office policy.

Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Read More

UPDATED: Prime Creator Makes an Announcement

Heather found this article on Rumor Mill News, she added this comment:
[8/3/13 3:37:48 AM] Jarrafusa: (chuckle)
[8/3/13 3:38:01 AM] Jarrafusa: I LOVE THE ABSOLUTE PLAN!!!!!!!!  I LOVE SURPRISES!
[8/3/13 3:38:35 AM] Jarrafusa: I LOVE EXPERIENCING OTHERS EXPERIENCING SURPRISES EVEN MORE!!!!!!!! ;)
-AK

updated 8/5/2013 Thought I should add this exchange to this post since it might be widely misinterpreted. 

A reader wrote:

Hello,  I need a bit of help to understand .....

Will you please explain who all of you are working with in other words the so called Galactic Federation?  What I’d like an explanation on is the post on your site regarding Prime Creator Makes an Announcement :  on the following section hi-lited 4 words?:  

First I should have made something clear, the post was not meant to reflect the views of the people I work with, but rather another groups view of how this process of earth changes comes about.

Quoting: "We now ask you, our dear Workers of Light, to be ready to lead the triumphant celebration, and the coming glorious procession to the ships, where you will all be renewed, with bodies in perfect health, and minds restored with memory and knowledge  of all you have known before, and much more."

Procession to the ships to be re-newed and minds restored?  This no doubt is a form of technology and absolutely nothing natural about it.  It has nothing to do with restoring our spiritual consciousness.  

There appears to be among those purported to be ETs the idea that humans need assistance in their DNA transformation via light chambers.  This is indeed a synthetic technology that has been reversed engineered from a natural process.   Heather has always said "the entire Earth is a crystal chamber".

It speaks of restoring a physical mind with memory this is programming.  As part of the government project this sounds like they gave up the idea of the blue beam project in attacking as aliens for a much better way to deceive by pretending to help the poor helpless humans.  

The souls that incarnated on Earth have been cut off from memory of their prior existence.   There is coming an "EVENT" where the natural soul connections to the embodiment are restored.  Restoring DNA is part of that process as the communication is a DNA communication issue.  Again Heather believes that this will be a natural process that doesn't require transport to ships or to crystal chambers in Inner Earth as Sheldan Nidle proposes.  

I think your instinct is somewhat correct but perhaps misguided.  I would ask why is they insist humans being synthetically limited to a 5D state, is someone somewhere afraid our abilities will not be limited to just 5D and what hierarchy does that threaten?

The telepathy they claim to be using as channeling has been around a long time where government can put thoughts and actual voice into a persons mind to cause them to be deceived and none of you are questioning this?  Why not? 

Yes there is technology that can implant voices in a person's brain.  Telepathy does happen and is indeed quite natural to most inhabited worlds.  It also seem to occur naturally in the animal world.

What cannot be faked is the spiritual content and intent of a message.   You discern that by how it affects you in your heart.  Does it generate fear?  Does it make you feel inferior?  Does it ask you to do things contrary to love?  From these things you know the source and the intent of the message and whether it should be rejected.   I am personally about as telepathic as a brick, but I have had a few instances of it, but it wasn't so much words as an understanding of what was needed.   Words sometimes are limiting, true telepathy encompasses more than language, its emotion and love and a full spectrum of communications.

Did you ever see the movie with Russell Crowe about the famous mathematician who had auditory hallucinations?    I have wondered if that man had been the target of such an experiment.     Really it comes down to this, just because someone hears a voice, doesn't mean they have to give up their own will and do what it says.  

Heather's point about the channeling Prime Creator [below on this blog post] (which she posted the day later and I need to add) was that anyone who claims to be the Creator she demands proof of their identity and from where they draw that authority.  I will add that to the post if I don't get sidetracked today.

This is not how one evolves.  This is a hierarchy of so called ascended masters B.S those working to keep the cabal in power and turning humans into robots.  

There are some of the "divines" who do not want humanity to advance.  Its not all of them [a minority actually - it just looks worse from our end of the situation because Earth has to deal with them].  But there's enough of them to create havoc on the planet as they attempt to maintain the status quo of their perceived special status.   The hierarchy is coming down in all realms.

And we are to be responsible for our choices and if one can be deceived he/she is not ready to evolve.  God hood, means just that, one cannot be deceived and comes from within not from outside of self.  

I agree.

I’m not saying one can’t hear voices/visions/receive healing naturally in their evolution but you better know the truth and research what you get using common sense and discernment… all is a test

Our spiritual consciousness needs no outside of self technologies of any kind for real evolution so please explain all of this so we know where your coming from.

Thank You, .   

Well said!

---

EARTHASCENDS.COM

Part 185

Prime Creator Makes an Announcement

MOTHER/FATHER GOD

Channel:  Kathryn E May, PsyD
August 02 2013

Prime Creator Speaks:

My Dear Ones, I do not often speak with you directly, but it is such an extraordinary time that I am taking this opportunity to tell you more about your world, and how important it is that you now concentrate very hard on raising your vibrations, especially those of you who have been so busy working, earning money to pay your bills and care for your families.

This time is over, done.  There will be no more bills to pay, no more worries about how you will feed your families, educate them, or survive during your retirement. Your retirement will be glorious beyond your wildest dreams, it will cost you nothing, and it begins now, no matter what your chronological age on Earth.  This will not be a retirement from Life, nor will it be a death. You are now on the threshold of a magnificent journey to the stars.

Your Brothers and Sisters are awaiting, just above you.  Look up at the skies on a clear night.  Send your greetings to them, and they will flash the colored lights on their ships to show their happiness, that you see them, and that they will soon be here with you, walking among you, embracing you, singing songs of celebration with you.  There are thousands now along the grid lines which carry the energy of the cosmos to uplift and teach you of Endless Love and Light.

It is I who am sending the powerful energies to you now.  It has been said that the waves of love you feel washing over you come from the Central Sun - the Sun which radiates outward from the center of the Universe.  That is true.  The Central Sun is another name for me, your Prime Creator.  I am the one who has created the beginning, the middle and the eternity which is now your reality.

Your Mother and Father God were my first children, and their group of Enlightened Ones who work with them here in your galaxy were their original Brothers and Sisters, and their eldest children.  So you see, you are being overseen by your parents and your cosmic Aunts and Uncles, who have known each of you, and have nourished and cared for every one of you as you have traveled through your many incarnations.

During the time that Mother/Father God were in training with me to learn to create planets, stars and living beings, their brothers and sisters were also learning to do the same.  They then went out across the Universe, which was waiting, empty of life, and they helped to teach the younger Gods, their younger brothers and sisters, to establish galaxies, to populate them with beings of various shapes and sizes, according to their creative imaginations.

Each one in training was first taught the Universal Laws which require that every created being be equipped first with the ability to communicate telepathically with their Creator, who is always in contact with me.  Thus, a grid of telepathic energy transmission was built as each Universe came into being.  It is this grid which makes it possible for me to speak directly with your channel, and for you to speak directly with Mother/Father God.  Others who are channeling now have tapped into that Universal communication system at various points, which gives them the ability to speak telepathically with the dolphins, the birds, the Arcturians, the Pleiadians, and so on.

So, you see, there is nothing weird or unusual about telepathic ability.  In fact, you are the only ones in all the Universes who seem to think so.  This is because you have been behind the Veil of Forgetfulness, of course.  You are the only ones who have experienced this absence of connection to me and to the Gods who created you.


Across the Multiverse, all are curious about how this experiment will end.  Will the humans who have been made blind and deaf be able to regain their senses?  Will they awaken from their nightmares to recognize their Family of Light?  What if they are permanently handicapped by the deafness they have experienced?  It has been millions of years now, in Earth time, since humans had all their senses intact.

When your scientists studied your DNA sequencing, they found many strands in your makeup which seemed to be inactive, useless.  They were puzzled, but they were far enough along in their own explorations to understand that nothing in creation is useless, and they suspected it was not a fluke of nature, although few of them were spiritually open enough to assume the truth.

The truth is that I have given my approval to Mother/Father God to begin activating those "unused" strands, which will change you in dramatic ways.  Your intelligence, your memory and your creativity will escalate rapidly.  The final goal is to allow you to be the magnificent Gods you are capable of being.  You will all eventually have the power to create, to know the Truth of your history and that of your galaxy, but it was necessary first that you each experience the challenges and obstacles of life in 3-dimensional bodies, with free will, and with little guidance from your Mother and Father.

You have suffered pain, physical and emotional trauma, loneliness and want, and the majority of you have survived with your hearts still intact.  You are still capable of Love, and when you are in pain, you look to the Light for your salvation.  This was the ultimate test, and you have come through it brilliantly.  Yes, many of you are still doubting, still insisting you do not believe in any of this, but the small open window in your hearts will allow the Truth to flow in as soon as your preoccupation with day to day "achievements" is removed from your lives.

You have been tested so strenuously because the Great Plan calls for your eventual leadership of all the galaxies.  You have experienced various forms of government on your planet, and have intuitively understood, across the globe, that democracy with full participation of all the people is indeed the most effective and fair system. It has been co-opted by the Dark Ones as every new attempt to establish freedom has been tried.  Even in the United States, the Grand Experiment was twisted into a despotic economic system which took the place of genuine freedom, and yet the people yearned for Truth.

The agitation across your planet is a glorious triumph of imagination.  Everywhere, humankind is rising to demand freedom, equality and dignity.  They say to themselves, "Never again."  Many do not yet completely understand what it is they are agitating for.  Some believe it is religious freedom, others fear the chaos that complete change will bring, but the march toward new ways of cooperating, and new means of communication have sealed their hopes for the future into Truth.

Your wars have very quickly been reduced to the last-ditch actions of a few Dark Ones on rooftops, declaring their preference for murder and mayhem, while thousands rush to help, to rescue and to heal their wounded fellows.  I have heard your pleas for help to end the mass violence, and now you are seeing the effects in your everyday lives of the end to personal violence as well.  The process is nearing completion, and completion means that each and every member of your planetary society is being required to make a choice, now.  Some will act on their inner rage and disillusionment, but others whose contract for violence has been ended will awaken and lay down their arms, in spite of brainwashing, mind control, and dedication to life as slaves to the Dark Ones.

As all of you were told before you began this incarnation, this is your last one. Never again will Planet Earth offer the 3-dimensional, free-will environment in which to test yourselves to the limit.  No more suffering, no more starvation, no more poverty, no more wars.  It is done.

Look around you at the beauty of your dear planet.  Go out of the cities to see what she was intended to look like, and what she did look like before the industries and massive population growth encroached on her dense forests, clear lakes and mighty oceans.  Go back to the forests, in silence and reverence for the Mother who has nurtured and loved you over these eons.  Give thanks to her, and when you send your Love down into the center of her being, she will be soothed and healed, and you will feel her gratitude and enormous Love.

You will see the weather, which is a response to your own feelings, calm.  As your hearts warm toward your Mother Earth and your fellow humans, so your climate will balance and level out, easing the cold and soothing the heat.  Gentle rain will replace hurricanes and tornadoes.  As the violence of human passion wanes, the weather on your planet will respond accordingly.  You have an expression, "Smile and the world smiles with you."  Extend this understanding to your relationship with Mother Earth and all her conscious beings, which includes every insect, every rock, every plant and every animal under her care.

Be at peace, Beloved Ones. The time of your personal testing is done.  You are now being given a time to rest, to contemplate and to restore your Peace of Mind.  Your trial is at an end, and you have all been found innocent, pure and gloriously One with your Creator.  It does not matter what stumbles you may have experienced in this life.  It is the accumulation of all your lives, all the times you have triumphed over despair, expressed Love for another or for yourselves that We see as the measure of your strength.  Be that Loving being now.  Look around you at those who would welcome your Love, and express it freely.  It matters not whether they know your name, or live in your household.  All will welcome your higher vibration of Love and Light.

Together you have worked, prayed and pleaded with me to allow your glorious Ascension now, in this lifetime, in this hour.  I am here to tell you now, it is granted.

All the necessary steps have been taken to allow this to happen.  The Prosperity Funds have been distributed and are ready to be dispersed.  Lucifer has returned to the arms of his family, and the 4th dimension has been collapsed, allowing no secrecy or separation from your Mother/Father God's love; the Archangels have assumed their mantles of Light, and the Masters have declared themselves as servants of the Light on Earth.  The ships are aligned and ready to bring their gifts and the great love of the Twin Flames who await their partners, many of whom are now aware of them, and familiar with their loving energy.

Mother Earth has been stabilized on her axis by the Galactic Forces, and will remain so until all her children have ascended in waves to higher dimensions.  All mass weaponry which would threaten the ships or the safety of those on the ground has been neutralized; the smaller weapons will be gradually disabled as the time draws near for the landings.  Announcements have been prepared and will be broadcast to everyone on the planet to reassure and inform all of you of the events as they unfold.

You see, no detail has been overlooked, no matter for concern has been left unaddressed, no question unanswered.  It will be a triumphant time for all; no unhappiness will be caused for any being on Earth unless they choose to turn their backs on Love.  Relationships both old and new will be blessed with Love, Forgiveness and Light, and all will transcend old conflicts, old pain, to ascend to higher vibrations of Love and Companionship.

We now ask you, our dear Workers of Light, to be ready to lead the triumphant celebration, and the coming glorious procession to the ships, where you will all be renewed, with bodies in perfect health, and minds restored with memory and knowledge  of all you have known before, and much more.

You who have worked so hard to transcend the doubts and criticisms of your fellows will feel the reward of finally being recognized and acknowledged for your wisdom and the strength of your hearts.  Be at peace, Dearly Beloved Ones.  You are the Pied Pipers of the Glorious Kingdom.  You have persevered, and you have triumphed.  Your time has come.  It matters not that you have suffered illness, poverty and pain.  Now, use these last days to rest and prepare.  Open your hearts to my Endless Love which heals all.  Quietly pray for all the others who will need your reassurance and your strength to complete their transitions.

I cannot describe to you the joy I feel as I watch these final accomplishments come to fruition.  It is truly the Beginning of the End, as Father God has said.  Prepare yourselves for the New Beginning in joy and in Faith.

I am your Creator, the Creator of all Creators, and I send you the most powerful waves of Love you have ever felt before.  I gather you to me, the children of my heart, and I send you Love without measure.  Until we meet again,

Prime Creator

Via Kathryn May, July 30, 2013, 12 pm.

Permission to copy only if message is used without deletions or changes, with citation to author and website. http://disclosure-2012.com/page/482254554

Kathryn E. May, PsyD
Who Needs Light?
kemay@aol.com

Read More

Removing the Shackles: The Beginning of the Lie.... oh my!

Comments in red are mine alone and not D's or the author she quotes. I will be updating the blurb on a previous article about the Pope and England to correct a few minor points to match this. Wonderful article below on the origins of Papal control on America. Also see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charter_of_1606 -AK

Saturday, 3 August 2013

The Beginning of the Lie.... oh my!
http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-beginning-of-lie-oh-my.html

.... You know.... if today gets any more fun, I might just laugh myself into a coma.

Yet another example of asking "What do I know?".... and there is the answer.

Further to the article I posted this morning from AK about the USA being a "non-profit religious corporation", here is the background.

Our History lesson for this morning starts in 1066 is jolly ol' England.....  enjoy!

And remember: these articles are just a quantum jumping pad to doing your own research.... on you go!


[AK NOTE: I have reformatted the text a bit in the section below for readability, the author of the article below appears to have OCR'ed some old books and the software converted the stylized "S" found in old books to "F"s, why they did that in old books and writing I don't know... but it is confusing for modern readers and especially to OCR software as the S looks like a cursive F... -AK]

reblogged from:
http://www.truthcontrol.com/articles/treaty-1213-beginning-lie

Treaty of 1213 - The Beginning of the Lie
admin's picture
By admin | June 28th, 2009
Source The Informer

Once upon a time before the year 1066 the people of England held Allodial title to their land. Not even the king could take the land for not paying a tithe. William the Conquer came in 1066 and stole the Kings Title and took the land of the people. From William I, 1066, to King John, 1199, England was in dire straits. It was bankrupt.

The King invoked the Law of Mortmain, the dead man's hand, so people couldn't pass their land on to the church or anyone else without the King's permission, (modern day probate?). Without Mortmain the King would lose the land he controlled. The Vatican didn't like that because the King owed a lot of pounds to the Vatican.



WHY? ¹ King John refused to accept The Vatican's representative, Stephen Langton, whom Pope Innocent III installed to rule England (religious or in fact?)² In 1208 England was placed under Papal interdict(?). Interdict means a prohibition.)

King John was excommunicated and in trying to regain his stature he groveled before the Pope and returned the title to his kingdoms of England and Ireland to the Pope as vassals, and swore submission and loyalty to him. King John accepted Langton as Archbishop of Canterbury, and offered the Pope a vassal's bond of fealty and homage. Two months later, in July of 1213, King John was absolved of excommunication, at Winchester, by the returned Archbishop of Canterbury, Langton.

On October 3, 1213, by treaty, King John ratified his surrender of his kingdoms to the Pope, as Vicar of Christ who claimed ownership of everything and everyone on earth as tradition.

Question 1. Where in the Bible did Jesus give any man this kind of power over all men and land? He didn't. He did not create a religion nor did he create the office of Pope.

Question 2. Can you have a third party break a contract between you and another person under duress..? Don't those of you who are forced into a contract reserve all your rights under modern UCC 1-207 and claim UCC 1-103?

The contract (treaty of 1213) was between two parties. Now the Barons of England would not put up with being slaves anymore so they took to the sword and made King John sign the Magna Charta. So doesn't this act of the Barons violate the principle of natural law, when they created the Magna Charta, as having no force and effect upon a contract between two parties?

Well Pope Innocent III, the other contracting party thought so, for he declared the Magna Charta to be: ". . .unlawful and unjust as it is base and shameful. . . whereby the Apostolic See is brought into contempt, the Royal Prerogative diminished, the English outraged, and the whole enterprise of the Crusade greatly imperiled." Quoted from G.R.C. Davis: Magna Charta. Trustee of the British Museum. London. 1965.

The Pope, in order to introduce strife in England and Ireland that would help him, used Jesus teachings to his advantage that is verified in the Gospels by two of His Apostles. So St. Levy (Mark 2:14; Luke 5:27), alias Matthew, cites Jesus at Matthew 10::34-36 and Luke 12:49, 51-3. Nothing reveals the antithesis of government and religion more clearly than these facts.

Question 3. What did the contract of 1213 A.D. create? A TRUST or CONTRACT. Only the two parties, the King's heirs and the Pope, can break the contract. For the Trust /Contract cannot be broken as long as there are heirs to both sides of the contract.

At this time in history we now know who controlled the Kings of England and the land of the world. For Now we have the Pope claiming the whole Western Hemisphere besides Europe. [the Western Roman Church -AK] The Holy See of Antioch [aka the Eastern Orthodox church -AK] ruled all the easterly side and the Holy See of Alexandria ruled the western side, so there was a conflict. ³

So, on with the story. The King's explorers had come to America to claim dominion over land by deceiving and murdering the natives, the American Indians. The King operated under the treaty of 1213 and everything was going along okay until the 1770's when the bunch of rogues called the "Founding Fathers" decided they wanted the benefits but not pay the taxes to the King. They, being lawyers, and professional educated men, didn't know they were still under the Pope's control? Their lies and fraud now would affect the American colonies and the people who lived on the land.

Those common people who fought in the American Revolution were unaware that the 1213 treaty still ruled despite the fact they THOUGHT the Magna Charta was a viable piece of work. ⁴ The Declaration of Rights in 1689 declared the Rights of the British subjects in England. At the end of the English Declaration it stated at Section III " ...that should any of the Rights just mentioned be in violation of the HOLY ALLIANCE (1213 Treaty), ...it is as if this Declaration was never written".

So we know that the English Declaration didn't fly, so what makes you think the 1774 Declaration of Rights in this British Colony would work. Weren't these people doing the same thing as the Barons did in 1215 A.D. to King John? A contract is a contract. Look at Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution. Can anyone obligate a contract? Were the "founding fathers" trying to obligate a contract between two parties that still have heirs living today?

Question 4. How important is the "ultimate benefactor", the Pope, The HOLY SEE, in the scheme of things? Move through history till modern times and pull Public Law 88-244, which follows Public Law 88-243 - the institution of the law - merchants Uniform Commercial Code. Are you shocked that the Pope is listed in this Public Law?

Doesn't the United States have an ambassador in the Vatican? Why? Is it a government like all other nations such as France, Japan, Spain or Brazil? The Vatican runs the world, it controls the British Crown. Is it any wonder they separate man's Church and government? They don't talk about the Lord Almighty's Church (government) do they. ⁵ "Organized churches" are given special tax privileges because the Vatican dictates to the sixty United States trustees through the trust document, the U.S. Constitution created by the 1783 treaty between the King, frontman for the Vatican, and Adams, Hartly, Laurens, & Franklin who were operating for the King and not the people of America. Look at Article VI of the Constitution for the United States for your answer as stated in the "New History of America".⁶

You see we are still under the Pope who rules over all nations as he declared he did back in 1213. The 1783 Treaty did say in the opening statement quoted exactly as it appears in olde English; "It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the Most Serene and Most Potent Prince, George the Third, by the grace of God, King of the Great Britain, France and Ireland, Defender, of the Faith , Duke of Brunswick and Laurenberg, Arch-Treasurer and PRINCE ELECTOR OF THE HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE, & C. AND OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, . . .."(Emphasis added in caps).

Did you catch the last few words? This is from a King (man) who can supposedly make no claim over the United States of America because he was defeated? The King claims God gave him the almighty power to say that no man can ever own property because it, "goes against the tenets of his church, the Vatican/Holy Roman Empire, because the King is the "Elector of the Holy Roman Empire’"

What about the secret Treaty of Verona, made the 22nd of November, 1822, which shows the power of the Pope and the Vatican's interest in the US Republic.

Here is part of The Secret Treaty of Verona. "The undersigned specially authorized to make some additions to the treaty of the Holy Alliance, after having exchanged their respective credentials, have agreed as follows:

ARTICLE I. The high contracting powers being convinced that the system of representative government is equally as incompatible with the monarchical principles as the maxim of the sovereignty of the people with the divine right, engage mutually, in the most solemn manner to use all their efforts to put an end to the system of representative governments, in what ever country it may exist in Europe, and to prevent its being introduced in those countries where it is not yet known.

ARTICLE 2. As it cannot be doubted that the liberty of the press is the most powerful means used by the pretended supporters of the rights of nations to the detriment of those of princes, the high contracting parties promise reciprocally to adopt all proper measures to suppress it, not only in their own state but also in the rest of Europe.

ARTICLE 3. Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to keep nations in the state of passive obedience which they owe to their princes, the high contracting parties declare it to be their intention to sustain in their respective states, those measures which the clergy may adopt with the aim of ameliorating their own interests, so intimately connected with the preservation of the authority of the princes; and the contracting powers join in offering their thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for them, and solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the nations."

Do we have a false God before us and worship him and his church instead of the real Lord, Jesus and his government. The divine right of kings exists in Clinton and every Governor of the states in corporate Union. Well let me go on record and say that the Lord gave me the same right as the Pope claims was given to him. Am I not a Steward upon the land of the Lord as a mere sojourner, the same as the Pope? Are not you also a Steward?

Did the Lord make a covenant with Adam and Eve to subdue the earth and reign over the animals and to populate the earth? Doesn't that contract still exist? And doesn't it exist with you also? And we, the true believers in that contract, can we take all the nations (mans) laws in the world and dump them in the ocean to regain our rightful place on this earth under the Lord's Natural Law to thwart the contract between King John and the Pope that appears to defeat the original contract the Lord made with man?

Yes, let us go back to the original contract and destroy the Vatican's control over everybody. Before 1066 the Pope did not claim all the land as the people claimed the land and didn't pay taxes on it to anybody. Didn't the Lord say to the people after coming out of Egypt, "why do you want a king when you have me and my contract?" Which Lord do you want to live under, a Pope, a King, President, Governors, Senators, Representatives, or a real Lord called Jesus Christ. "Christians," are ridiculed and put down because they read the Word of the Lord correctly and could defeat even the best the Pope has to throw at them.

The King James version of the Bible is just that. A version concocted by the King under the guidance of the Pope so as to hide the real truth. I was taught by the church I went to, which is government controlled as it has to be by the treaty of 1213 and reiterated in the 1783 Treaty between The Pope's Elector, King John and the First President of the United States, Sam Huntington and Charles Thompson, Secretary. I read the passage, when Jesus was on the cross, from a very old manuscript that said, "Forgive them NOT, for they know what they do." This is different than what most people believe he said, "Forgive them for they know not what they do." [I could think of better examples of the alteration and twisting of scripture but his point is valid they have been altered -AK]  Bottom line is that when men write, transcribe, translate, update, and copy over thousands of years they always alter the interpretation, words and insert their own meanings. You can see this in just the 200 years that our country became separated from England, but still remains a colony under different compact and use of clever wording. But that is another whole subject that you do not know about.

Eminent domain and Allodial title:

Why and where did "eminent domain" rear its ugly head? Right after the King's government was formed here in America. Eminent domain replaced the Law of Mortmain of England and when government wanted your land they claimed eminent domain thereby destroying that to what people think they have allodial title. Allodial title only existed in America when the King granted the use of the land to the likes of William Penn, .........

But it could be taken at any time. Are you or were your great, great, great grandfathers ever free to hold land that could never be taken away? Ask some of today's farmers and see how many lost their farms to the government that belonged to their past family and I'll bet none of the land goes back to the 1789 era. Well it's a wonderful world to live in the end times, isn't it. Read Revelations [a common practice of Protestantism is to call the book "Revelations" when its actually "Revelation" or more correctly the "Revelation of St John the Divine" (there's that divine word again LOL! - he was not the John - the friend of Jesus - that's another John). The usage of that plurarized name comes from hearing too many Protestant preachers mispronounce the book's name... The book is technically not a Christian in origin. Its a first century Jewish text in the genre of Jewish Apocalyptic writings of the time, of which there were many. Rome had a habit of vacuuming up cultures it conquered and appropriating their writings, gods, and art. For example Rome imported the Greek gods and renamed them. Judea was sacked by Romans and the temple was desecrated with pigs blood and destroyed. To Jews at the time it seemed the end of the world, it was certainly the end of their world as they knew it. They sought deliverance from God. It almost didn't make it into the Bible canon, probably because its thinly veiled references to Rome. Catholic Priests don't tend to reference it much. -AK] to see where the false preachers come from. Who is the "Harlot" in Revelations?

Does the Vatican come close with a mortal calling himself the "vicar" of Christ?

Here is the definition of vicar in Webster's 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language.
Vicar: "In a general sense, a person deputed or authorized to perform the functions of another; a substitute in office."

The Pope PRETENDS to be vicar of Jesus Christ on earth.

Pretend; To hold out as a false appearance; to offer something feigned instead of that which is real; To exhibit as a cover for something hidden.

You bet your life the Pope has something to hide. He is no more powerful than You. The King is no more powerful than You. The American President and Governor's are no more powerful than You. You allow THEM run your lives ...WHY.?

Thinkers, you cannot fight the Pope or the King on their contract even though you are affected by the contract. You must go elsewhere for relief. Remember the first contract in history, God with Adam and Eve? You had better because you were a part of it as an heir and it is your saving grace. Why do you think the "courts of common law" are despised and Government and States are taking action to stop them? See where the power lies when this happens? Clinton, the Governors, and Congress of the United States and the Legislatures of the several states are only following orders and delegate to the 60 U.S. Trustees, who always show up in bankruptcy generated mostly by IRS actions. Isn't that a starting point?

What do Trustees administer? A trust? The Constitution is a trust, correct? It was created by the 1783 Treaty, correct? It is not the private man's trust contract, correct? Only those entering into the contract are UNDER the constitution and are bound by it, correct? Look up the definition of "under" in words and phrases and a good dictionary such as Webster's 1828 at Vol. II, 101. I, my dear readers, am not "under" some damn corporate trust (constitution) drafted in secrecy by the King and corporate lawyer esquires (you call them the "Founding Fathers") whom were controlled by the Treaty of 1213, wherein the Vatican still ruled over all. It was never "my constitution" and never will be. The Constitution does not apply to me nor will it ever.

However, some of the states' representatives in 1776 realized that the Constitution was a commercial contract among the Founding Fathers to protect their financial interests in the Americas and in Europe. The Articles of the Bill of Rights is designed to keep those United States citizens whom are bound by the Constitution (contract) from encroaching upon my natural Law Rights, (With this hint in mind you may discover where the IRS gets its purported power that makes you liable, because you claim to be UNDER the constitution, but they will never admit it because only a few know the real reason and they are not about to tell their agents. The same goes for any license issued to you by the corporate States). I hope you have read the Supreme Court cases of State and United States cited in my previous books that prove beyond any shadow of a doubt I am correct in my previous two sentences. Yet you always fall back into the trap by claiming citizenship of the United States AND THE STATES.

No! You are not a citizen of the corporate or organic State if you want to be free. You cannot claim it is your constitution and remain free. You cannot claim representatives in the legislatures and remain free. How about your estate? State and Estate come from the same contract.
Webster's 1828 Dictionary defines it;

"ESTA'TE, n. 1. In a general sense, fixedness; a condition; now generally written and pronounced state. (6) The general interest of business or government; hence a political body; a commonwealth; a republic.

But in this sense, we now use State." Get the picture? We are the ryots tenure holding the "estate" of the King called your estate. Belong to a body politic and you are a slave. In my previous books I told the people a "republic" is a fraud, for then you belong to the estate of the King which makes you a law-merchant holding as a trustee the King's land that he is holding in trust for the Vatican. The States are the "estate " of the Vatican/King cabal with the money changers along for the ride are a full blown consortium which includes the Congress/President/ Governors et al. I don't want to drive you crazy, since you might not comprehend all that is here. Once you know the truth and let go of all you were taught by the government and the preachers you don't become the drowning man grasping at the lies to stay afloat. Have you ever wondered why you were sinking while pleading case law and their constitution to protect you?

Bye till next time,
The Informer

Footnotes:

[1] (WHY?). Because the Pope claimed all lands as the vicar of Christ and the king owed money from the Vatican that was to be collected by the Church of England. The church reduced their parishioners to mere serfdom. When they died the church got the property and the King, in order to preserve what property he had instituted the law of Mortmain. This prevented the people from willing the land to the Pope. When the pope got wind of this he excommunicated the King. That's the explanation for the Why?

[2] This is a fact that is documented in the English documents of History at the Leeds Library.

[3]The conflict between each of the Holy Sees, one controlling the western front (America) and the other controlling the China side with the dividing line somewhere in Spain and France through Germany. The Pope is the figurehead, remember and the best way to explain it is Congress is Alexandria and the Senate is Antioch.

[4] (Why doesn't the Magna Charta hold more force and effect than a later contract between the king and the Pope? Because the Pope decreed it null and void as it would break the contract he had initiated with the King. The Magna Charta was a contract breaker by third parties and that was a no-no in any law. Besides the Pope owned England and how could the Barons take the land that the King pledged let alone all the surfs that the Pope still controlled through the church of England? He can't and so the Magna Charta was declared Void. Now the Pope, through the front man, The King, could create the other contracts called treaties and no one is the wiser. Remember, the Pope was being controlled by the creditor, The Rothschilds to whom the Pope was indebted.

[5] Why? It is clear as a bell. The "church" of GOD is 'Government of GOD and man created all these religions and made churches for them. They, man, cannot allow the Government of the Lord "Church upon this rock" to get in the way of the government of men, now can they?

[6] "New History of America", by The Informer
People you can read this for yourself in American Council of Christian Laymen: "How Red Is The Federal Council of Churches", Madison, Wisconsin, 1949. Now you may better understand James Montgomery's latest as to why all the declarations, Magna Charta, etc. have no effect. Read on to see why.

See: James Montgomery's - "British Colony III" on the Internet. To further prove what I say that the declared rights were also at the mercy of any previous charters or grants from the king of England you must read section 25 of the 1776 North Carolina Constitution, Declaration of Rights which states; "And provided further, that nothing herein contained shall affect the titles or possessions of individuals holding or claiming under the laws heretofore in force, or grants heretofore made by the late King George II, or his predecessors, or the late lords proprietors, or any of them."

Posted by Breaking The Silence at 08:10

Read More

SLATE: All Corporations Go to Heaven

A pharmacist works at a Safeway pharmacy in Great Falls, Va., in 2009.
The Supreme Court will need to decide soon whether corporations with
religious objections to providing coverage for birth control could be
 forced to do so under the health care law. Photo by Hyungwon Kang/Reuters

My comments are in red italics -AK

All Corporations Go to Heaven
The Supreme Court will soon decide if CEOs can impose their religious convictions on the people who work for them.
By Dahlia Lithwick
Posted Thursday, Aug. 1, 2013, at 2:32 PM

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/08/do_corporations_have_religious_beliefs_the_supreme_court_will_need_to_decide.html?wpsrc=upworthy


Remember the big dustup last summer over the contraception mandate in President Obama’s health reform initiative? It required companies with more than 50 employees to provide insurance, including for contraception, as part of their employees’ healthcare plans. The constitutional question was whether employers with religious objections to providing coverage for birth control could be forced to do so under the new law. The Obama administration tweaked the rules a few times to try to accommodate religious employers, first exempting some religious institutions—churches and ministries were always exempt—and then allowing companies that self-insure to use a separate insurance plan to pay and provide for the contraception. Still, religious employers objected, and lawsuits were filed, all 60 of them.

A year later, the courts have begun to weigh in, and the answer has slowly begun to emerge: maybe yes, maybe no. It all depends on whether corporations—which already enjoy significant free-speech rights—can also invoke religious freedom rights enshrined in the First Amendment.

Last Friday, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the contraception mandate, rejecting a challenge from a Pennsylvania-based cabinetmaker who claimed that as a Mennonite he should not be compelled to provide contraceptive coverage to his 950 employees because the mandate violates the company’s rights under the free exercise clause of the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The owner considers some of the contraception methods at issue—specifically, the morning-after and week-after pills—abortifacients.



The appeals court looked carefully to the precedent created by Citizens United—the 2010 case affording corporations free-speech rights when it came to election-related speech—to determine whether corporations also enjoy constitutionally protected religious freedom. Writing for the two judges in the majority, Judge Robert Cowen found that although there was “a long history of protecting corporations’ rights to free speech,” there was no similar history of protection for the free exercise of religion. “We simply cannot understand how a for-profit, secular corporation—apart from its owners—can exercise religion,” he concluded. “A holding to the contrary … would eviscerate the fundamental principle that a corporation is a legally distinct entity from its owners.”
Cowen also flagged the absolute novelty of the claims, noting that there was almost no case law suggesting that corporations can hold religious beliefs. “We are not aware of any case preceding the commencement of litigation about the Mandate, in which a for-profit, secular corporation was itself found to have free exercise rights.” Finally he took pains to distinguish the corporation, Conestoga, from its legal owners. “Since Conestoga is distinct from the Hahns, the Mandate does not actually require the Hahns to do anything. … It is Conestoga that must provide the funds to comply with the Mandate—not the Hahns.”

Judge Kent Jordan, dissenting at length in the case, said that for-profit, secular corporations can surely avail themselves of the protections of the religion clauses. “To recognize that religious convictions are a matter of individual experience cannot and does not refute the collective character of much religious belief and observance ... Religious opinions and faith are in this respect akin to political opinions and passions, which are held and exercised both individually and collectively.”
The 3rd Circuit decision creates a significant split between the appeals courts, because a few short weeks earlier, the Colorado-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Hobby Lobby Stores Inc., finding by a 5–3 margin that corporations can be persons entitled to assert religious rights. Hobby Lobby is a chain of crafts supply stores located in 41 states. The 10th Circuit upheld an injunction blocking the contraception requirement because it offended the company owners’ religious beliefs. The majority in the 3rd Circuit wrote that it "respectfully disagrees" with the 10th Circuit. A split of this nature makes Supreme Court review almost inevitable.

The Supreme Court has long held the free exercise clause of the First Amendment to prohibit governmental regulation of religious beliefs, but a long line of cases holds that not every regulation that inflects upon your religious beliefs is unconstitutional. The Religious Freedom Restoration Act bars the federal government from imposing a "substantial burden" on anyone’s "exercise of religion" unless it is "the least restrictive means of furthering [a] compelling governmental interest." The Obama administration and the judges who have refused to grant injunctions contend that the burden here is insignificant, amounting to a few dollars borne indirectly by the employer to facilitate independent, private decisions made by their female employees. They also argue that they are promoting a compelling government interest in providing preventive health care to Americans. The employers and the judges who have enjoined the birth-control provision claim that they are being forced to choose between violating protected religious beliefs and facing crippling fines and that free or inexpensive birth control is available at community health centers and public clinics.

Basically, the constitutional question will come down to whether a for-profit, secular corporation can hold religious beliefs and convictions, or whether—as David Gans explains here —“the Court’s cases recognize a basic, common-sense difference between living, breathing, individuals—who think, possess a conscience, and a claim to human dignity—and artificial entities, which are created by the law for a specific purpose, such as to make running a business more efficient and lucrative.” Will Baude takes the opposite view, explaining that the 3rd Circuit’s reasoning—that “ ‘corporations have no consciences, no beliefs, no feelings, no thoughts, no desires’ ... would all prove too much, because they are technically true of any organizational association, including ... a church!” Baude likens the claim that corporations can never have religious freedom rights to the claim that corporations—including the New York Times—can never have free-speech rights.

Part of the problem, at least in the case of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga, is that neither corporation was designed to do business as religious entities. It has been clear since the nation’s founding that corporations enjoy rights in connection to the purposes for which they were created—which is why the administration already exempts religious employers whose purpose is to inculcate religious values and chiefly employ and serve people who share their religious tenets. This is about companies that don’t meet those criteria. As the dissenters at the 10th Circuit observed, the fact that some “spiritual corporations” have some religious purposes doesn’t make every corporation a religious entity. And as professor Elizabeth Sepper of Washington University puts it in a new law-review article on the subject: “Corporations, as conglomerate entities, exist indefinitely and independently of their shareholders. They carry out acts and affect individual lives, and have an identity that is larger than their constituent parts. Walmart is Walmart, even when Sam Walton resigns.”

The rest of the problem is self-evident. Where does it stop? Why does your boss’ religious freedom allow her to curtail your own? The dangers in allowing employers to exercise a religious veto over employee health care are obvious. Can an employer deny you access to psychiatric care if he opposes it on religious grounds? To AIDS medications? To gelatin-covered pills? Constitutional protections of a single employer’s individual rights of conscience and belief become a bludgeon by which he can dictate the most intimate health decisions of his workers, whose own religious rights and constitutional freedoms become immaterial.

Religious liberty arguments have been historically advanced in defense of the rights of slaveholders, segregationists, creationism, anti-gay bigotry, and gender inequality. The religious convictions in each instance were indisputably deeply felt and fundamental. That didn't mean they trumped everything else. As we have advanced as a society—beyond slavery, segregation, homophobia, and sexism—we have worked to accommodate religious belief while pushing for fundamental fairness and equality. It’s never been a perfect accommodation. It can't be. But religious liberty interests are rarely the only—or even the most important—interests at play. And suggestions that unwilling employers are forcing birth control on unwilling employees misstates the truth: Employees who choose to use contraception (as 99 percent of us will do at some point) shouldn't do so at the sufferance of their bosses.

In 1982, in United States v. Lee, an Amish employer refused to pay his share of Federal Insurance Contributions Act taxes on his employees, claiming that it violated his own religious belief in individual self-sufficiency. The Supreme Court said he had to pay the taxes regardless because “[w]hen followers of a particular sect enter into commercial activity as a matter of choice [notice how UCC law comes into play here -AK], the limits they accept on their own conduct as a matter of conscience and faith are not to be superimposed on the statutory schemes which are binding on others in that activity. [business and religion are in two separate legal jurisdictions  religious freedom is a natural right under the organic Constitution -AK] Granting an exemption from social security taxes to an employer operates to impose the employer’s religious faith on the employees.” And in a 1990 opinion written by Justice Antonin Scalia, the court held that religious groups bear a heavy burden in overcoming “a valid and neutral law of general applicability.” None of this guarantees how the Supreme Court will decide the contraception mandate. If recent history is any predictor, it may be as fractious as the Affordable Care Act decisions themselves.

The guarantee of religious freedom enshrined in the Constitution was intended to protect fragile minorities from crushing religious burdens imposed by the wealthy and powerful. The notion that secular corporations [operating under UCC Law -AK]—created by government [current also operating under UCC law -AK] to maximize shareholder profits and limit liability—might lay claim to their owners’ human rights of religious conscience is doubly astounding when you consider that their principal reason for being is to dissociate themselves from the frailties of human conscience in the first place.

Read More

UPDATED: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC. Registered in Delaware as a Religious Non-profit Corporation

by American Kabuki
8/2/13 Note: minor corrections to law origins of Papal fealty in England -AK
8/4/13 struck out text that was not historically accurate, inserted text and link to an article that gives the in depth story of how England swore fealty to the Vatican. -AK

If you've been wondering how the Pope Francis recent Apostolic Letter regarding the Roman Curia law removing legal immunity and liability from governments, attorneys and judges, might affect governments around the world, then read on. I got many inquiries asking for how a Roman law can affect an ostensibly secular government.  And that's a far enough question...and I couldn't remember the exact reason in law why that was true, so I asked a friend who I knew would know.

I got this reply from a friend well versed in law and the history of the legal systems:

It pre-dates this but in looking to John the Noble (King John) before the Magna Carta, He was trying to break away from the Vatican back in the middle ages, I can get dates later.
Pope Innocent III in 1216 stuck King John's balls to the fire with the king's nobles by threatening to excommunicate him and all of England if he did not pledge fealty to the Papal SEE (along with money and land).
The nobles threatened to wage war to dethrone him. He caved. Hence the Papal SEE took over the title to the land of England and its wealth. The Magna Carta came about as a result of John's reign pissing off the nobles with the contention with Pope Innocent III in 1216.  John's judicial reforms had a lasting impact on the English common law system.

In fundamentals of law class I learned that Roman Law is a foundation of modern law (not Natural Law -  2 different entities). Later on Church law became the overseer of that existing law. Papal Bulls took over around 1455 which is much like the current Executive Orders each succeeding tyrant signs to circumvent the constitutional; based law here.

AK: For the complete story (with accurate dates) of how England swore fealty to Rome see: http://americankabuki.blogspot.com/2013/08/removing-shackles-beginning-of-lie-oh-my.html 

LATE UPDATE: 8/2/2013 3:37 PM I got this URL from Lisa Harrison to an article that goes into the importance of Pope Francis Apostolic Letter to law:  http://blog.ucadia.com/2013/07/motu-proprio-of-francis-and-why-by-rule.html Its well worth a read!

LATER UPDATE 8/2/2013 4:44 PM I got another URL from Lisa Harrison, this one is a video that gives a good deal of background history on the Vatican bank (IOR) and how the Vatican came to control vast tracks of land.  http://www.presstv.com/Program/313317.html

I knew the deed for Washington DC was held at a Catholic Diocese (read thread found HERE):

....from the D&B sponsored Mantra Corp website, linked below:
If you click on the “Government of the United States HQ” link, you’ll see another website page with some fairly detailed—and possibly bewildering—information. For example, you’ll see that this “Government of the United States” has its address at:

“The U.S. Capitol

“Washington, DC 20515-0001”

Its phone number is “(202) 224-3121”. Business Hours are “24/7”.

You can click the “map” link and see a graphic indicating that this “Government” is located on “Capitol Hill” (same place as Congress) in Washington DC.

None of that seems particularly surprising (other than the idea that our “Government” might be a “company” and/or a conglomerate of “companies”). But the Manta.com report does begin to seem a little strange under the heading “About Government Of The United States” where we read:

“government, owner Archbishop Deric R. McCloud of Basilica Shrine, Michigan and 4th NE Street, Washington,DC”. 

I wasn't aware the purported "government" was registered as religious non-profit corporation in Delaware. This was sent to me today... given the above it's really not surprising I suppose....but here it is in black and white!

  USA INC Corp Registration in Delware

Read More

The Blessing of DIS-ILLUSION-MENT

Simulacra and Simulation book from the movie Matrix

The Blessing of DIS-ILLUSION-MENT
by American Kabuki

It was 30 below in St. Paul the dark night Rodney rang me.  "Hey man, you gotta see this movie, I'm coming over!"  He didn't say why he wanted me to see it, drove all the way from Eden Prairie to St Paul just to get me.  Rodney liked to do things just to watch my reactions.  He drove me out to a cineplex in Burnsville MN. The roads were icy and cold and I remember crossing that arched suspension bridge on I-35 West going over the Mississippi out of the Twin Cities and wondering if the tires would steer straight with all the ice.  I really didn't want to go off the edge in the Mississippi that night.   The parking lot of the cineplex had at least 2 inches of ice on it. It was tough to walk without falling and busting my ass. Not a night I will ever forget.  "This better be worth it Rodney!"  "Oh man you will like this one!" he smiled and laughed.

The movie was the Matrix, and it appeared to be a movie about a hacker.  Started out that way too, until Neo took the painful red pill of facing reality for the first time, and then the movie took a sudden and much unexpected turn.

I should have known what was coming with the knock on the door. Neo pulled out the disk for his data hungry customer and his party friends  from the hollowed out book Simulacrum and Simulation, by Jean Baudrillard.

Simulacrum (plural: simulacra), from Latin: simulacrum which means "likeness, similarity",^[1] was first recorded in the English language in the late 16th century, used to describe a representation, such as a statue or a painting, especially of a god. By the late 19th century, it had gathered a secondary association of inferiority: an image without the substance or qualities of the original.

Neo discovered after taking the red pill that his world was nothing like he thought it was. Not his job, not his employer, not even his own makeup and being.  He was a slave and farmed for the energy his and many millions of others created.  And since the body cannot exist for long without the mind, his mind was fed an illusion so that his energy could be harvested without resistance.

The movie haunted me.  There was a basic truth in it. And it ached like some really awful heretical truth nobody wanted to talk about. Everyone felt it.  We are farmed.  I learned this year, like the Matrix,  it was about the extraction of energy.  Human energy. Not just my tax dollars or paycheck. The method is not a tower of vats of KY Jelly lit by red LEDs with comatose humans on neoprene tubes.  The method is a tower of grey pin stripped suited bankers around the planet running the most sophisticated energy extraction system the world has ever seen.  It is also automated, and it is full of AI programs!

I took for granted from my youth America was dominant in the world and was indoctrinated into the belief that we had superior morals and higher ideals.  That was why we succeeded while India and China starved. Or so the propaganda went.  We were told in the 1960s about how mean and nasty Russians made women work and leave their kids in government run day schools.  We all had stay-at-home moms and didn't fancy them not being there when we got home from schools.  We were told how they spied on their people and jailed them for no reason, torturing enemies foreign and domestic.  We were taught to duck and cover under our desks in case a nuclear bomb hit. Like that would make any difference?

Many decades have passed and almost all women must work in America, whether they have kids or not, just to make ends meet.   A car that cost $4000 in the 1960s now costs $35,000.  We learned our government tortures and they call it "enhanced interrogation" as do the police sometimes.  Our once mighty financial status, grown through leased gold from the Chinese Royal families and the circumstances of having won World War II has been dissipated by our own greedy shorted sighted Corporations looking for the cheapest labor.  The prosperity has gone back to the Chinese. We emerged unchallenged into in the 1940s and the rest of the world was in shatters, now we are in shatters and the rest of the world is moving on.

I had been anesthetized to the illusion I lived in by my religious upbringing. I believed that all evil came from the devil and his minions. And from the looks of things he was winning and God was losing.  Most religions make a lot of money off that fallacy. My religion was the only true cure specially delivered to my faiths very prophet for the end time. That cut and dried, black and white binary view of things was clean and simple and didn't require much thought. We had a pigeon in hole for every problem on earth. And we thought we had the cure, some half cocked idea of a theocracy which was just another coercive form of religious tyranny that has since played itself out in Iran, Afghanistan and half dozen other countries much to the horror of the occupants.  God bless the young Scottish woman in Scotland that pointed that out to me when I was working in England.

I discovered in 1994, that my religion was every bit a part of crazy world that surrounded it, full of men ready to betray their friends for a church pension, only to be denied their pension by the men who held that over their heads.  In some respects the religion of my youth was wackier than the world it pretended it was separate from.   We were taught that all authority was God given, especially in the church.  Rebellion to church or state was the very act of the devil.  How very lucky for the state!  The religion bred a generation of people who all too willingly suffered abuse and did nothing about it.  "God will changes this" was the common refrain, but they never could see themselves as being the Eternal Essence from God manifested in human form to bring the needed changes.  At least "the world" lived in the present, we lived for the future and not the present. We lived for promises that could never be delivered based on premises that were never true for very large amounts of money we gave in the present.

I knew the explanations I had no longer worked. I couldn't carve up and dice humanity into simple terms like good and evil, or God and the Devil as it is often externalized as if either set of behaviors is somehow not in our nature, it seemed that very dichotomy and the belief in the separation was also part of the control, and for someone somewhere all that mattered was that people be divided and fighting one another in the name of God, religion, political party, or gender or sexual politics. Religions talk about love but show very little of it to those who don't believe their dogma.

Governments talk about justice but in practice you only get the justice you can afford.  Free enterprise is lauded as the path to financial independence but the very largest companies you see very little of it that isn't tied to government contracts, subsidies, or tax credits.   Playing with stacked deck is considered just good business.

Create a label, cut and paste on your favorite enemy.  Everyone seemed to have a light and dark side, and this seemed to be intrinsic to the human experience. Did we choose to experience all this and the situation was some contrived simulacra of reality run by parties unknown? The Matrix?   Or a vast long ago conceived Experiment? Even in the darkness of humanity there is undeniably great acts of light and love.

The growth of knowledge of what IS has grown exponentially since 2000. It will continue to grow until it is all known and made plain in all realms of existence.   Those of us looking forward to disclosure in finance, ETs, and all the corruption in government and business, have long anticipated it.  Even prayed for it.  Sought it with all our being. And some have even died or we jailed exposing it.

Now its happening so fast and so out in the open and not even the main stream press can cover it up.
CNN today quite openly said the CIA was running guns to Syrian rebels out of Benghazi and sending arms via networks in Turkey. This has been rumored for months, but now its on mainstream TV news.  That opens up an area of public discussion that really needs the disinfectant of sunshine.

Truth will set you free, but first it will really piss you off!  The log jam of lies is breaking loose and river of truth is beginning to flow, many will find themselves in great disillusionment. Thoughts of "how could I be so blind" or "how could I be so stupid" will cross your mind.  Be gentle with yourself, you were in an illusion for the experience of it, and quite possibly you came here specifically to be a part of ending it.  So no need to beat yourself up, billions of others are in the same shoes.

Consider the word, DIS-ILLUSION-MENT.  Removed from the illusion. Removed from the Simulacra, the simulation...  But it can be a jarring experience. It can leave you stunned.  I have seen people become completely disoriented when they discovered their religion was nothing like they were told and they were lied to by their leaders.  Most, after a time, went on to productive lives, some pretended nothing happened and continued on. A few had some really bizarre symptoms and extremes of behavior.  Talking with others who are experiencing the same thing is so helpful. You are not alone. The responses vary, and you will see a lot of variety of response to the revelations of truth that are coming to your attention the coming days.  DIS-ILLUSION-MENT is a blessing.  It can be painful and disorienting or joyful and exciting.  Depends on how you want to view it. Truth is the fertile soil for healthy BEing and DOing.  Lies were told to keep you from BEing and DOing. The time has come for Truth.  Time to BE Eternal Essence inbodied and DO.

Stay in Joy and may your journey be smooth.

-AK

Read More

Mel Ve's Conversation with Heather Tucci-Jarraf

Mel Ve conversation's with Heather Tucci-Jarraf

Read More